Any type of contract work always generates an expectation, especially if we talk about making a deal with a photographer or a wedding photographer, after all, this moment is extremely special and your greatest desire is to get such or that professional goal to capture the most beautiful details and the most memorable moments of your ceremony.
When the entrepreneur is satisfied with the results obtained by the camera of a certain professional, everything works perfectly, besides an absolutely happy couple, the impact is extremely positive on the reputation of those who have worked hard to take the photographs, but it can also be used in such a way that it increases demand, being good natural advertising , without the need for any marketing. “strength” to show his talent.
- However.
- The opposite effect can be as devastating as it is beneficial.
- As a photo shoot that no one likes can cause as serious a situation as that in Canada.
- After not being satisfied with Amara Wedding’s work.
- Emily Liao has launched a true epic of malicious infractions and comments about the company and the company’s responsible wedding photographer.
- Kitty Chan.
In just over a year, the client made so many comments that they hurt Amara Wedding’s business that the company filed a lawsuit against Emily for defamation. This process resulted in a favorable case for Kitty’s business and the need for the disgruntled customer to pay $115,000 (approximately R$382,000) for moral damage.
As discovered, Amara Wedding provided services to Emily Liao and her husband not only with the mission of wedding photographer, but also in aspects such as makeup, hairstyle, decoration and even the master of ceremonies. With the end result, Emily claimed to have been mistreated by employees and did not pay all amounts agreed by contract.
After demanding the delivery of the photos and listening to Kitty Chan that she would not receive the full result until after returning the remaining payment, the customer initiated the entire defamation process.