A Nikon SLR like the D4S costs you about 5500 euros, without lenses, for this price you can buy a good used car.
The Nikon D3200 currently costs 340 euros on Amazon, less than 10% of the initial cost.
- Such a price difference surely has a reason: one camera can’t cost 10 times more than another just because yes.
- I imagine the photographic quality will be at least 10 times better.
- Let’s look at some examples.
I know what you’re thinking now: what kind of bad-taste joke is it, Mario?How does a camera cost $5,000 to produce such horrible photos?”Sorry, the images are authentic. If you follow the links that appear on the head of the article, you can check its veracity What did you expect?
Don’t answer me yet. Let’s see the photos of a camera as modest as the Nikon D3200, with its ridiculous price of less than 400 euros.
Again, we are extremely surprised when we see these kinds of examples.
Don’t worry, this is just one example by which I try to illustrate my idea, if you search the Internet you will find good and bad photos of both cameras, but almost everyone has the false belief that an expensive camera will give you beautiful photos, while a cheap camera will carry more modest and regular photos. A matter of superstitions (or not), almost everyone associates the price of a camera with its quality. The photo selection you just saw is a faithful proof that there is no relationship, that a photo is good or bad depending on many factors, not just the camera.
In addition, for most amateur photographers, the least relevant in terms of the quality of a photograph is the camera itself, there are many other factors that have more weight, such as the photographer himself, the objective, among other factors. spend 10 times more money on a much more expensive camera for an amateur photographer?
For a professional, an SLR at such a disproportionate price can make sense: it may require a much more powerful camera, a camera that gives you a quicker response to shooting, much more advanced features, etc. Everything does not matter because such a monumental waste of money is later recovered with the work that the professional photographer will cover.
For the amateur photographer, unfortunately, this is not the case
If you’re a professional photographer and think its use justifies it, buy the right camera you see, no one will know better than you what you need.
If, on the other hand, you are dedicated to photography by passion or as a hobby, you are looking for a SLR camera that you can use intensively, with which you can take great photos, that will accompany you when you need it, in those little unpredictable moments that you like to portray, and that also do not ruin you, I recommend my list with the best SLR cameras.
Don’t you know that much of the merit of a good photograph is usually taken by the goal with which it is done ?, in the goals section we talk extensively about some of the goals that will revolutionize the way you take photos. You want a hint, take a look at the one I call the King of Goals?
Final note: This article has no scientific basis. You are free to formulate your own opinion and share it in the comments. This appropriate camera is not a mathematical formula, it is the subjective opinion of a server that loves photography and who firmly believes in the idea that cameras do not make photographers. The item is a desperate cry against beliefs that encourage competition in the size and price of the camera. This is a countercurrent article. Rare is the support or blog in which they will recommend buying a camera at a low price compared to a very expensive camera. For good or worse, the photographer’s blog is different.
Thanks for reading it, photographer.